McNeil v. McCormack
This text of 182 F. 808 (McNeil v. McCormack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the petition of both bankrupt and trustee, and under the certificate of the referee, the entire proceedings, including the evidence taken before the referee relating to the orders andl findings of the referee on the original pétition of the trustee, were before the judge with full jurisdiction for such action as the case required.
In the ruling that counsel for the trustee should file a formal proceeding setting forth the alleged contempts of the bankrupt and give him an opportunity to be heard thereon, nor in dismissing the proceeding when counsel for trustee repudiated the attachment and declared! their inability to furnish the evidence to support charges for contempt, do we find any reversible error.
The petition for revision is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 F. 808, 105 C.C.A. 240, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcneil-v-mccormack-ca5-1910.