McNeil v. Maryland

505 F. App'x 279
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 22, 2013·No. No. 12-2139·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. McNeil appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and related claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeil v. Maryland, No. 8:11-cv-02495-DKC (D.Md. Aug. 22, 2012). We deny McNeil’s motion to strike the Appellees’ briefs and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNeil v. Maryland, 505 F. App'x 279 (4th Cir. 2013).

505 F. App'x 279 (McNeil v. Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aldmyr Systems, Inc. v. Friedman
215 F. Supp. 3d 440 (D. Maryland, 2016)