McNeil v. Markuski
This text of 562 F. App'x 179 (McNeil v. Markuski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
In these consolidated appeals, Michael A. McNeil appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders overruling his objections to proofs of claim in his bankruptcy proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeil v. Markuski, 499 B.R. 484 (D.Md.2013). We deny McNeil’s motion to strike Appellee’s informal brief and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
562 F. App'x 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcneil-v-markuski-ca4-2014.