McNeil v. Lewis
121 S.E. 141, 31 Ga. App. 297, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 901
Opinion
Under the particular facts of the case the court did not err in striking paragraph 3 of the plea, and the amendment thereto, or in refusing to strike a portion of the petition, or in thereafter rendering judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against both defendants.
Judgment affirmed.
143 Ga. 569; Civil Code (1910), §§ 4267, 5796; 155 Ga. 630; 123 Ga. 784.
Civil Code (1910), §§ 3562, 3556; 114 Ga. 668 (3); 155 Ga. 630; 138 Ga. 473; 9 Ga. App. 350; 56 Ga. 605; 143 Ga. 569 (distinguished); 139 Ga. 646; 33 Ga. 491.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McNeil v. Lewis, 121 S.E. 141, 31 Ga. App. 297, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 901 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).
121 S.E. 141 (McNeil v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bartlett v. Lee
33 Ga. 491 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1863)
Meador v. Dollar Savings Bank
56 Ga. 605 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1876)
Whitley v. Hudson
40 S.E. 838 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
House v. Oliver
51 S.E. 722 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Hendrix v. Bauhard Bros.
75 S.E. 588 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Daniel v. Reeves
77 S.E. 1067 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Reeves v. Daniel
85 S.E. 756 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)
Sanders v. Ayers
117 S.E. 651 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)
West Yellow Pine Co. v. Kendrick
71 S.E. 504 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)