McNeil v. Hicks
This text of 431 S.E.2d 868 (McNeil v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court’s order appealed from in this case is interlocutory, as it does not dispose of the case as to all parties, leaving nothing to be judicially determined between them in the trial court. See Veasey v. City of Durham, 231 N.C. 354, 57 S.E.2d 375, rehearing denied, 232 N.C. 744, 59 S.E.2d 429 (1950). As such, it is not immediately appealable unless it affects a substantial right of defendant Allstate. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-277 (1983); G.S. § 7A-27 (1989). The avoidance of one trial is not a substantial right entitling a party to an immediate appeal from an interlocutory order. See Leasing Corp. v. Myers, 46 N.C. App. 162, 265 S.E.2d 240 (1980), and cases cited and discussed therein.
In this case, defendant Allstate will not lose its right to appeal if and when plaintiff is awarded damages for which defendant Allstate might be liable.
Even though the trial court certified its order as being immediately appealable, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 54(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, such certification is not disposi-tional when the order appealed from is interlocutory. Leasing Corp., supra.
For the reasons stated, this appeal must be dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
431 S.E.2d 868, 111 N.C. App. 262, 1993 N.C. App. LEXIS 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcneil-v-hicks-ncctapp-1993.