McNeese v. Herring
This text of 8 Tex. 151 (McNeese v. Herring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No evidence appears to be offered by the plaintiff to prove that the prosecution was malicious or without probable cause. Títere was no ruling of the court which prevented the plaintiff from introducing such evidence. And without proof of tiie want of probable cause and malice this action cannot be maintained. (Griffin v. Chubb, 7 Tex. R.) There is no error in the judgment, and it is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Tex. 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcneese-v-herring-tex-1852.