McNees v. Scholoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McNees v. Scholoff

2 A.D.2d 820, 155 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4378

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 24, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 820 (McNees v. Scholoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McNees v. Scholoff, 2 A.D.2d 820, 155 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4378 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order dated February 2, 1956, granting defendant’s motion, pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 426 of the Civil Practice Act, to be relieved of his failure to comply with the provisions of that statute, and for permission to file a demand for a jury trial nunc pro tunc, and from an order dated March 8,1956, denying plaintiff’s motion to reargue the motion which resulted in the order [821]*821of February 2, 1956. Order dated February 2, 1956, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from order dated March 8, 1956, dismissed, without costs. The order is not appealable. (Zirn v. Bradley, 263 App. Div. 724; Cohen v. Nadelman, 269 App. Div. 951.) Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order dated February 2, 1956, granting defendant’s motion, pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 426 of the Civil Practice Act, to be relieved of his failure to comply with the provisions of that statute, and for permission to file a demand for a jury trial nunc pro tunc, and from an order dated March 8,1956, denying plaintiff’s motion to reargue the motion which resulted in the order [821]*821of February 2, 1956. Order dated February 2, 1956, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from order dated March 8, 1956, dismissed, without costs. The order is not appealable. (Zirn v. Bradley, 263 App. Div. 724; Cohen v. Nadelman, 269 App. Div. 951.) Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 820, 155 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnees-v-scholoff-nyappdiv-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack