McNeer v. Dipboy

Indiana Supreme Court

McNeer v. Dipboy

13 Ind. 542

DecidedNovember 15, 1859

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Ind. 542 (McNeer v. Dipboy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McNeer v. Dipboy, 13 Ind. 542 (Ind. 1859).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit on a note. Answer, among other things, a release by said plaintiffs in writing, &c., which is lost, &c. Reply in denial. Demurrer to the reply, on the ground that it was not sworn to. Demurrer overruled.

This presents the only point in the brief of the appellants. There was no error in the ruling of the Court upon the point made. Magee v. Sanderson, 10 Ind. R. 261.

The judgment is affirmed with 10 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Suit on a note. Answer, among other things, a release by said plaintiffs in writing, &c., which is lost, &c. Reply in denial. Demurrer to the reply, on the ground that it was not sworn to. Demurrer overruled.

This presents the only point in the brief of the appellants. There was no error in the ruling of the Court upon the point made. Magee v. Sanderson, 10 Ind. R. 261.

The judgment is affirmed with 10 per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Ind. 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcneer-v-dipboy-ind-1859.