McNeary's Arborists, Inc. v. Carley Capital Group

406 S.E.2d 644, 103 N.C. App. 650, 1991 N.C. App. LEXIS 863
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedAugust 6, 1991
DocketNo. 9026SC887
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 406 S.E.2d 644 (McNeary's Arborists, Inc. v. Carley Capital Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McNeary's Arborists, Inc. v. Carley Capital Group, 406 S.E.2d 644, 103 N.C. App. 650, 1991 N.C. App. LEXIS 863 (N.C. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PHILLIPS, Judge.

The trial court’s holding is erroneous, and we reverse it. For a deed of trust or other security instrument to have priority from the date of recordation as to obligations incurred after the instrument is recorded, G.S. 45-68(1) requires that the instrument show three things, one of which is:

c. The period within which such future obligations may be incurred, which period shall not extend more than 10 years beyond the date of the security instrument.

Under the explicit terms of First Federal’s deed of trust, the period within which Carley’s future obligations could be incurred expired on 3 March 1988. Thus, under the provisions of G.S. 45-68 the only obligations incurred by Carley that related back to the recording date of the deed of trust were those incurred through 3 March 1988, and the obligations incurred after that date did not have seniority over plaintiff’s intervening lien. The agreement later made by Carley and First Federal to extend the term in which obligations could be incurred did not affect plaintiff’s rights under the deed of trust as recorded.

The partial summary judgment in favor of defendants is reversed and the case remanded to the trial court for the entry of an order enforcing plaintiff’s lien against the sale proceeds held by the trustee.

In their brief defendant appellees argued two other questions but they were not raised in the trial court and cannot be considered.

Reversed and remanded.

Judges ARNOLD and WELLS concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust From Hall
708 S.E.2d 174 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
406 S.E.2d 644, 103 N.C. App. 650, 1991 N.C. App. LEXIS 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnearys-arborists-inc-v-carley-capital-group-ncctapp-1991.