McNear v. Selsky

25 A.D.3d 1043, 808 N.Y.S.2d 818
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 26, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 25 A.D.3d 1043 (McNear v. Selsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McNear v. Selsky, 25 A.D.3d 1043, 808 N.Y.S.2d 818 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Froceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

A correction officer observed petitioner approach another inmate and exchange punches with him. Fetitioner disregarded several direct orders from the correction officer to stop fighting, even when the other inmate attempted to comply with the orders. As a result of the incident, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with fighting and refusing a direct order. At the ensuing tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner requested no [1044]*1044witnesses and offered no defense. Petitioner was found guilty of both charges and, as modified on administrative appeal, a penalty of, among other things, six months confinement and loss of good time was imposed.

Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report written by the correction officer who witnessed the incident is sufficient, by itself, to constitute substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966 [1990]; Matter of Encarnacion v Goord, 19 AD3d 906 [2005]). We have reviewed petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his challenge to the penalty imposed and tier classification of the charges, and find them to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Muniz v. Goord
32 A.D.3d 1073 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Retamozzo v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
31 A.D.3d 1083 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 A.D.3d 1043, 808 N.Y.S.2d 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnear-v-selsky-nyappdiv-2006.