McNealy v. State of Florida
This text of McNealy v. State of Florida (McNealy v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-0523 _____________________________
SAMUEL MCNEALY,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
September 25, 2024
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED.
ROBERTS, RAY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Samuel McNealy, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McNealy v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnealy-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.