McNealy v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 25, 2024
Docket1D2024-0523
StatusPublished

This text of McNealy v. State of Florida (McNealy v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McNealy v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2024-0523 _____________________________

SAMUEL MCNEALY,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

September 25, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Samuel McNealy, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McNealy v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnealy-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.