McNeal v. Taylor
25 S.E. 16, 99 Ga. 159
Opinion
This court will not reverse a judgment overruling a motion for a new trial based on the general grounds that the verdict rendered was contrary to law and the evidence, when it appears that the only matters passed upon by the jury were exceptions of fact to an auditor’s report, and that they found against the exceptions upon conflicting evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McNeal v. Taylor, 25 S.E. 16, 99 Ga. 159 (Ga. 1896).
25 S.E. 16 (McNeal v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moore v. King
80 S.E.2d 74 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)