McNeal v. Taylor
25 S.E. 16, 99 Ga. 159
This text of 25 S.E. 16 (McNeal v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McNeal v. Taylor, 25 S.E. 16, 99 Ga. 159 (Ga. 1896).
Opinion
This court will not reverse a judgment overruling a motion for a new trial based on the general grounds that the verdict rendered was contrary to law and the evidence, when it appears that the only matters passed upon by the jury were exceptions of fact to an auditor’s report, and that they found against the exceptions upon conflicting evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Moore v. King
80 S.E.2d 74 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 S.E. 16, 99 Ga. 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcneal-v-taylor-ga-1896.