McNeal v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

McNeal v. State

380 S.W.3d 654, 2012 WL 4513711, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1238

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 2, 2012·No. No. WD 74159·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Harry McNeal appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief. McNeal argues that counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to file a motion to dismiss his case on the theory that the seventeen-year delay between the crime and his indictment resulted in a violation of his right to due process pursuant to the Fifth Amendment. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Harry McNeal appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief. McNeal argues that counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to file a motion to dismiss his case on the theory that the seventeen-year delay between the crime and his indictment resulted in a violation of his right to due process pursuant to the Fifth Amendment. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

McNeal v. State, 380 S.W.3d 654, 2012 WL 4513711, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1238 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

380 S.W.3d 654 (McNeal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.