McNeal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McNeal v. State

567 So. 2d 47, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7388, 1990 WL 140279

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 26, 1990

DocketNo. 88-01539

StatusPublished

This text of 567 So. 2d 47 (McNeal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McNeal v. State, 567 So. 2d 47, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7388, 1990 WL 140279 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends, and the appellee agrees, that upon revocation of community control or probation, based upon a single violation, a trial court is limited under the sentencing guidelines to a one cell “bump-up.” Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla.1989). Thus, the defendant’s sentence beyond the one cell “bump-up” was an unauthorized departure from the sentencing guidelines.

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends, and the appellee agrees, that upon revocation of community control or probation, based upon a single violation, a trial court is limited under the sentencing guidelines to a one cell “bump-up.” Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla.1989). Thus, the defendant’s sentence beyond the one cell “bump-up” was an unauthorized departure from the sentencing guidelines.

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

567 So. 2d 47, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7388, 1990 WL 140279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcneal-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack