McNatt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McNatt v. State

1911 OK CR 488, 118 P. 1111, 6 Okla. Crim. 672, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 489

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 21, 1911

DocketNo. A-951.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 488 (McNatt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McNatt v. State, 1911 OK CR 488, 118 P. 1111, 6 Okla. Crim. 672, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 489 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PEB CUBIAM.

Plaintiff in error, W. L. McNatt, was convicted of a violation of the prohibition law, and on the 23rd day of May, 1910, was sentenced to pay a fine of one hundred dollars and be confined in the county jail thirty days. The petition in error and ease-made were not filed in this court until the 23rd day of November, 1910, and the Attorney General, therefore, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that it was not perfected within the time allowed by law. The motion is sustained, and the appeal accordingly dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEB CUBIAM.

Plaintiff in error, W. L. McNatt, was convicted of a violation of the prohibition law, and on the 23rd day of May, 1910, was sentenced to pay a fine of one hundred dollars and be confined in the county jail thirty days. The petition in error and ease-made were not filed in this court until the 23rd day of November, 1910, and the Attorney General, therefore, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that it was not perfected within the time allowed by law. The motion is sustained, and the appeal accordingly dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 488, 118 P. 1111, 6 Okla. Crim. 672, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnatt-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.