McNatt v. Parker

Second Circuit

McNatt v. Parker

11 F. App'x 30

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJune 6, 2001

DocketNo. 00-26

StatusPublished

This text of 11 F. App'x 30 (McNatt v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McNatt v. Parker, 11 F. App'x 30 (2d Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[31]*31 SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.

Carlton Edward Jolley, pro se, informa pauperis, and incarcerated, appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 56(c). Specifically, Jolley appeals the district court’s dismissal of his Eighth Amendment and procedural due process claims, as well as the sufficiency of the district court’s “guidance” as to how he could cure pleading deficiencies. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in Judge Nevas’s Ruling and Order. See McNatt, et al. v. Unit Manager Parker, et al., No. 96 CV 1397(AHN), 1997 WL 251578 (D.Conn. Jan. 18, 2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[31]*31 SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.

Carlton Edward Jolley, pro se, informa pauperis, and incarcerated, appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 56(c). Specifically, Jolley appeals the district court’s dismissal of his Eighth Amendment and procedural due process claims, as well as the sufficiency of the district court’s “guidance” as to how he could cure pleading deficiencies. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in Judge Nevas’s Ruling and Order. See McNatt, et al. v. Unit Manager Parker, et al., No. 96 CV 1397(AHN), 1997 WL 251578 (D.Conn. Jan. 18, 2000).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 F. App'x 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnatt-v-parker-ca2-2001.