McNary v. State
This text of 772 S.W.2d 135 (McNary v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Appellant, Joseph Lamar McNary, was convicted of possession of over 28 grams of cocaine and sentenced to 28 years’ imprisonment. Appellant appealed to the Dallas Court of Appeals which affirmed the conviction. McNary v. State, 747 S.W.2d 932 (Tex.App.—Dallas, 1988).
We granted appellant’s petition to review the Court of Appeals’ opinion. We have determined, however, that appellant’s petition was improvidently granted.
Just as in any case where this Court refuses to grant a petition for discretionary review, our decision to dismiss appellant’s petition as improvidently granted should not be construed as approval of the Court of Appeal’s opinion.
Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is ordered to be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
772 S.W.2d 135, 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 132, 1989 WL 62559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnary-v-state-texcrimapp-1989.