McNary v. State

772 S.W.2d 135, 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 132, 1989 WL 62559
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 14, 1989·No. No. 591-88·Published

Opinion

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Joseph Lamar McNary, was convicted of possession of over 28 grams of cocaine and sentenced to 28 years’ imprisonment. Appellant appealed to the Dallas Court of Appeals which affirmed the conviction. McNary v. State, 747 S.W.2d 932 (Tex.App.—Dallas, 1988).

We granted appellant’s petition to review the Court of Appeals’ opinion. We have determined, however, that appellant’s petition was improvidently granted.

Just as in any case where this Court refuses to grant a petition for discretionary review, our decision to dismiss appellant’s petition as improvidently granted should not be construed as approval of the Court of Appeal’s opinion.

Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is ordered to be dismissed.

CLINTON and TEAGUE, JJ., dissent. DUNCAN, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNary v. State, 772 S.W.2d 135, 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 132, 1989 WL 62559 (Tex. 1989).

772 S.W.2d 135 (McNary v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McNary v. State
747 S.W.2d 932 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)