McNaney v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
161 N.W. 1054, 136 Minn. 463, 1917 Minn. LEXIS 602
Opinion
The above cause having been submitted by stipulation on the briefs and arguments presented upon the appeal in the same cause from the order denying appellant’s motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, and wherein a decision was filed on April 28, 1916, (132 Minn. 391, 157 N. W. 650), it is now considered that, for the reasons stated in the decision referred to, the judgment rendered in the court below should be and hereby is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McNaney v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co., 161 N.W. 1054, 136 Minn. 463, 1917 Minn. LEXIS 602 (Mich. 1917).
161 N.W. 1054 (McNaney v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McNaney v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
157 N.W. 650 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1916)