McNaney v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
This text of 161 N.W. 1054 (McNaney v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The above cause having been submitted by stipulation on the briefs and arguments presented upon the appeal in the same cause from the order denying appellant’s motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, and wherein a decision was filed on April 28, 1916, (132 Minn. 391, 157 N. W. 650), it is now considered that, for the reasons stated in the decision referred to, the judgment rendered in the court below should be and hereby is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 N.W. 1054, 136 Minn. 463, 1917 Minn. LEXIS 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnaney-v-chicago-rock-island-pacific-railway-co-minn-1917.