McNamee v. Steele
This text of 69 P. 319 (McNamee v. Steele) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— It appears from the petition and exhibits thereto attached and from the return of the defendant to the writ that the defendant, as the judge of the district court of the second judicial district, did, on the fifteenth day of May, 1902, without application therefor, and without notice to plaintiff, who had no opportunity whatever of presenting his defense, made an order suspending the plaintiff from practicing law as an attorney in all the courts of this state for a period of one year. Said order is void, because the judge had no juris[540]*540diction to make the same. It is therefore ordered by this court that the order suspending plaintiff from practicing law as an attorney in the courts of this state, made as aforesaid, be* and the same hereby is, annulled. No costs to be taxed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 P. 319, 8 Idaho 539, 1902 Ida. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnamee-v-steele-idaho-1902.