McNamara v. Virginia

Fourth Circuit

McNamara v. Virginia

434 F. App'x 248

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 7, 2011·No. No. 10-2356·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Patrick James McNamara appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McNamara v. Commonwealth of Va., No. 3:10-cv-00782-HEH (E.D.Va. Nov. 16, 2010). We deny the motion for default judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Patrick James McNamara appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McNamara v. Commonwealth of Va., No. 3:10-cv-00782-HEH (E.D.Va. Nov. 16, 2010). We deny the motion for default judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

McNamara v. Virginia, 434 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

434 F. App'x 248 (McNamara v. Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related