McNamara v. Stealth Power, LLC
This text of McNamara v. Stealth Power, LLC (McNamara v. Stealth Power, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, ) 4 ) Plaintiff, ) Case Nos.: 2:12-cv-00536-GMN-VCF 5 ) 2:18-cv-01813-GMN-DJA ) 2:18-cv-02281-GMN-VCF 6 vs. ) 2:17-cv-02966-GMN-NJK 7 ) 2:17-cv-02967-GMN-BNW ) 2:17-cv-02968-GMN-NJK 8 ) 2:17-cv-02969-GMN-DJA AMG SERVICES, INC., et al., ) 9 ) AMENDED ORDER1 10 Defendants. )
11 12 Pending before the Court is court-appointed monitor Thomas W. McNamara’s (“the 13 Monitor’s”) Motion to Extend Time for Completion Deadline for Monitor, (ECF No. 1315). 14 Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and Defendants AMG Services, Inc., et al. 15 (“AMG Services”) filed Responses, (ECF Nos. 1319, 1320). 16 For good cause appearing, the Court grants the Monitor’s Motion to Extend Time for 17 Completion Deadline for Monitor. The Monitor asserts that despite the Supreme Court’s 18 decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission, 593 U.S. ___ 19 (2021), his appointment has not been invalidated because his authority “derives from the 20 inherent power of a court of equity to fashion effective relief,” rather than from the FTC’s 21 authority to pursue monetary remedies under Section 13(b) of the FTC Act. (Mot. Extend Time 22 2:13–25, ECF No. 1315); (Mot. Status Conference 2:12–24, ECF No. 1308). In contrast, AMG 23 argues that because the Supreme Court found that “§ 13(b) does not ‘authorize[] the 24
25 1 This Amended Order clarifies that only the parties in FTC v. AMG Services, Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00536-GMN- VCF, are ordered to appear at the status conference on July 13, 2021. 1 Commission to seek, [or] a court to award, equitable monetary relief,’” the monitorship should 2 be terminated. (AMG Services’ Resp. 3:6–7, 4:10–11, ECF No. 1320). Because there are 3 unresolved issues regarding the Monitor’s authority and the administration of the monitorship 4 estate, it is premature to terminate the monitorship at this time. However, the parties shall 5 appear for a status conference on Tuesday, July 13, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. to determine the 6 Monitor’s continued authority and the future of the monitorship estate. 7 Accordingly, 8 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Monitor’s Motion to Extend Time for Completion 9 Deadline for Monitor, (ECF No. 1315), is GRANTED. 10 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties in FTC v. AMG Services, Inc., No. 2:12- 11 cv-00536-GMN-VCF, shall appear for a status conference on Tuesday, July 13, 2021, at 10:00 12 a.m. 13 DATED this _2__3__ day of June, 2021. 14 15 ___________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge 16 United States District Court 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McNamara v. Stealth Power, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnamara-v-stealth-power-llc-nvd-2021.