McNamara v. Kelly

32 A.D.3d 747, 820 N.Y.S.2d 797
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 21, 2006·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Paviola A. Soto, J.), entered January 10, 2005, which denied the petition to annul respondents’ determination denying petitioner’s application for accident disability retirement benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-k (the Heart Bill), and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Objective medical evidence supports the Medical Board’s finding that petitioner’s cardiomyopathy is due to a mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction unrelated to his nonobstructive coronary artery disease or recently diagnosed and well-controlled hypertension, and suffices to rebut the statutory presumption that the cardiomyopathy is job related (see Matter of Seldon v Kelly, 21 AD3d 840 [2005]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Marlow, Nardelli, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNamara v. Kelly, 32 A.D.3d 747, 820 N.Y.S.2d 797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

32 A.D.3d 747 (McNamara v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walsh v. Board of Trustees
37 A.D.3d 370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Knorr v. Kelly
35 A.D.3d 326 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)