McNamara v. Garrity

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

McNamara v. Garrity

6 A. 668, 78 Me. 418, 1886 Me. LEXIS 82

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided November 9, 1886·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Virgin, J.

Of the several questions raised by the bill of exceptions, the only one relied on and argued by the defendants’ counsel, relates to the sufficiency of the affidavit, wherein the [420]*420plural forms of the pronouns were used, although only one of ■the debtors was arrested.

In 1851, the same question was raised, but the court considered 'it too technical and adjudged the affidavit sufficient. Stare ■decisis. Cates v. Noble, 33 Maine, 258.

Exceptions overruled.

Peters, C. J., Daneorth, Libbey, Foster and Haskell, .JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Virgin, J.

Of the several questions raised by the bill of exceptions, the only one relied on and argued by the defendants’ counsel, relates to the sufficiency of the affidavit, wherein the [420]*420plural forms of the pronouns were used, although only one of ■the debtors was arrested.

In 1851, the same question was raised, but the court considered 'it too technical and adjudged the affidavit sufficient. Stare ■decisis. Cates v. Noble, 33 Maine, 258.

Exceptions overruled.

Peters, C. J., Daneorth, Libbey, Foster and Haskell, .JJ., concurred.

McNamara v. Garrity, 6 A. 668, 78 Me. 418, 1886 Me. LEXIS 82 (Me. 1886).

Pincite

6 A. 668 (McNamara v. Garrity) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related