McNamara v. Garrity

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

McNamara v. Garrity

6 A. 668, 78 Me. 418, 1886 Me. LEXIS 82

CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine

DecidedNovember 9, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 6 A. 668 (McNamara v. Garrity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McNamara v. Garrity, 6 A. 668, 78 Me. 418, 1886 Me. LEXIS 82 (Me. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Virgin, J.

Of the several questions raised by the bill of exceptions, the only one relied on and argued by the defendants’ counsel, relates to the sufficiency of the affidavit, wherein the [420]*420plural forms of the pronouns were used, although only one of ■the debtors was arrested.

In 1851, the same question was raised, but the court considered 'it too technical and adjudged the affidavit sufficient. Stare ■decisis. Cates v. Noble, 33 Maine, 258.

Exceptions overruled.

Peters, C. J., Daneorth, Libbey, Foster and Haskell, .JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI