McNamara v. Eastman Kodak Co.
189 A.D. 923
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1919
StatusPublished
This text of 189 A.D. 923 (McNamara v. Eastman Kodak Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McNamara v. Eastman Kodak Co., 189 A.D. 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).
Opinion
Motion for reargument granted, and particularly on the question whether or not the court should have limited the jury in its consideration of the alleged fraud of Mullen in procuring the release, to the claim that the $300 was paid to the plaintiff as a gratuity only. Reargument to be had on October thirteenth.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
189 A.D. 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnamara-v-eastman-kodak-co-nyappdiv-1919.