McNamara v. Eastman Kodak Co.
190 A.D. 928
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1919·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Upon reargument, judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Foote and De Angelis, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal and granting a new trial, upon the ground that defendant’s exceptions to the charge of the court and its refusal to charge as requested, were well taken. [See 188 App. Div. 997; 189 id. 923.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McNamara v. Eastman Kodak Co., 190 A.D. 928 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).
190 A.D. 928 (McNamara v. Eastman Kodak Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
June Fabrics, Inc. v. Teri Sue Fashions, Inc.
194 Misc. 267 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)