McNamara v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co.

92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 527
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 11, 1915
StatusPublished

This text of 92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 527 (McNamara v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McNamara v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co., 92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 527 (Ohio 1915).

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals affirming the judgment of the common pleas court and the judgment of the court of common pleas of Franklin county, be and the same are both reversed, for error of the common pleas court in instructing the jury that as a matter of law Michael Barry and J. S. Power were fellow servants, and that the plaintiff could not recover on the ground of the negligence of Power, that question being a mixed question of fact and law, to be determined by the jury under proper instructions by the court.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamakee and Matthias, JJ., concur. Newman, J., dissents. Jones, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 Ohio St. (N.S.) 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnamara-v-cleveland-cincinnati-chicago-st-louis-ry-co-ohio-1915.