McNamara v. City of Rittman

707 N.E.2d 943, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1206
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 7, 1999
DocketNo. 98-366
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 707 N.E.2d 943 (McNamara v. City of Rittman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McNamara v. City of Rittman, 707 N.E.2d 943, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1206 (Ohio 1999).

Opinions

The appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent separately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McNamara v. Rittman
Sixth Circuit, 2007
Harry McNamara v. The City of Rittman
473 F.3d 633 (Sixth Circuit, 2007)
McNamara v. City of Rittman
2005 Ohio 6433 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2005)
McNamara v. Rittman
1999 Ohio 454 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
707 N.E.2d 943, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnamara-v-city-of-rittman-ohio-1999.