McNally v. Sears

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McNally v. Sears

112 A.D.2d 1070, 492 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52275

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 21, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 112 A.D.2d 1070 (McNally v. Sears) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McNally v. Sears, 112 A.D.2d 1070, 492 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52275 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Helen Curzio Sears as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 10, 1985 for the public office of Councilmember from the 34th Council District of the City of New York, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Bianchi, J.), dated July 29, 1985, which dismissed the proceeding.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The record clearly established that the respondent candidate was duly registered to vote with the Board of Elections of the City of New York under the name Helen Curzio Sears. The appellant failed to present any evidence to controvert that fact, nor was there a showing that the respondent candidate sought to misrepresent or withhold any information from the electorate regarding her name. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Helen Curzio Sears as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 10, 1985 for the public office of Councilmember from the 34th Council District of the City of New York, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Bianchi, J.), dated July 29, 1985, which dismissed the proceeding.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The record clearly established that the respondent candidate was duly registered to vote with the Board of Elections of the City of New York under the name Helen Curzio Sears. The appellant failed to present any evidence to controvert that fact, nor was there a showing that the respondent candidate sought to misrepresent or withhold any information from the electorate regarding her name. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A.D.2d 1070, 492 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnally-v-sears-nyappdiv-1985.