McNally v. Samuel Appel Co.

189 A.D. 918
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1919
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 189 A.D. 918 (McNally v. Samuel Appel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McNally v. Samuel Appel Co., 189 A.D. 918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

The evidence amply justified the finding of negligence upon the part of the appellant. Plaintiff had the right, in a measure at least, to rely on the presumption that the driver of the automobile would obey the law and would not enter the prohibited zone within eight feet of the street car, and if the plaintiff had seen the approaching automobile he still could have relied on the presumption that it was slowing down with the intention of stopping in obedience to the law. (Code of Ordinances of the City of New York, chap. 24, art. 2, § 17, subd. 3; Crombie v. O’Brien, 178 App. Div. 807.) Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Mills, Rich, Putnam, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Merkert
198 A.D. 246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 A.D. 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnally-v-samuel-appel-co-nyappdiv-1919.