McNally v. Patterson

135 A.2d 281, 153 Me. 115, 1957 Me. LEXIS 44
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided October 11, 1957·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

This is an action upon a writ of entry. The plaintiff received a verdict with a special finding establishing the disputed property line and an award of damages. The case is before us upon the stereotyped motion for a new trial.

There was substantial, credible evidence to support the verdict in all respects. A discussion of the evidence would be futile. The jury entertained and answered authoritatively a typical, jury question with finality. A careful examination of the record discloses no error of law or of fact in the verdict, which requires correction. McCully v. Bessey, 142 Me. 209, 212.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNally v. Patterson, 135 A.2d 281, 153 Me. 115, 1957 Me. LEXIS 44 (Me. 1957).

135 A.2d 281 (McNally v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. HORNBROOK INCORPORATED
140 A.2d 493 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1958)