McNally v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad
96 A. 293, 88 N.J.L. 729, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 266
This text of 96 A. 293 (McNally v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McNally v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad, 96 A. 293, 88 N.J.L. 729, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 266 (N.J. 1916).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kaliseh in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chief Justice, Gabeison, Teenchabd, Beegen, Mintubn, Black, Teehune, Heppeftiieimek, Williams, Tayloe, JJ. 10.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
96 A. 293, 88 N.J.L. 729, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnally-v-hudson-manhattan-railroad-nj-1916.