McNair v. State

563 So. 2d 804, 1990 WL 88093
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 1990·No. 89-2372·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

563 So.2d 804 (1990)

Clifford McNAIR, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 89-2372.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 26, 1990.

*805 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Rosa C. Figarola, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Roberta G. Mandel, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Although the trial court was under a misapprehension that the language of section 775.084(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1987), was mandatory and not permissive, see State v. Brown, 530 So.2d 51 (Fla. 1988), we nonetheless affirm the sentence under review; the sentence imposed falls within the sentencing guidelines, does not exceed the enhanced statutory maximum penalty for the crime, and therefore does not constitute an abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNair v. State, 563 So. 2d 804, 1990 WL 88093 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

563 So. 2d 804 (McNair v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. State
651 So. 2d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Isom v. State
619 So. 2d 369 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Sheffield v. State
580 So. 2d 790 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Henry v. State
581 So. 2d 928 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Wesley v. State
578 So. 2d 418 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Smith v. State
574 So. 2d 1195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)