McNair v. City of Wilmington
This text of 520 F. App'x 220 (McNair v. City of Wilmington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
In these consolidated appeals, Anthony Lee McNair appeals the district court’s orders adopting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McNair v. City of Wilmington, No. 4:12-cv-00276-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2013); McNair v. City of Rocky Mount Police Dep’t, No. 4:12-cv-00275-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2013); McNair v. Hicks, No. 4:12-CV-00274-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
520 F. App'x 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnair-v-city-of-wilmington-ca4-2013.