McNair v. Anthony J. Annucci

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedMarch 5, 2020
Docket7:17-cv-09568
StatusUnknown

This text of McNair v. Anthony J. Annucci (McNair v. Anthony J. Annucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McNair v. Anthony J. Annucci, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Oe SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK oom. 2020 teen □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ . □

LARRY McNAIR, Plaintiff, 17-cv-9568 (NSR) -against- OPINION & ORDER NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF : CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, et al., Defendants, : □□□ eee eee ene eneceneneneneemnen KX NELSON S. ROMAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Larry McNair (‘‘Plaintiff’ or “Munoz”), proceeding pro se, commenced the instant action asserting claims sounding in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as against multiple defendants. By letter dated November 15, 2019, Defendants’ counsel informs that Plaintiff purportedly passed away in August 2019. His last know next of kin is Lisa Stevens, Plaintiff's girlfriend, who he resided with prior to passing. By letter dated February 7, 2020, Defendants submits a copy of Plaintiffs death certificate, which was also provided to his next of kin. Rule 25(a)(1) provides, in pertinent part, that: If a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper party. A motion for substitution may be made by any party or by the decedent's successor or representative. If the motion is not made within 90 days after service of a statement noting the death, the action by or against the decedent must be dismissed, Rule 25 establishes a ninety-day period for any party to make a motion to substitute a party for the decedent. See Kaplan v. Lehrer, 173 F. App'x 934, 935 (2d Cir.2006). The ninety- day period can be extended where there is “an inability or a significant difficulty in identifying the decedent's legal representative or successor. See Unicorn Tales, Inc. v. Banerjee, 138 F.3d 467, 470 (2d Cir.1998), Plaintiff's only known next of kin, notified the Defendants of Plaintiffs

passing in October 2019. Moreover, a copy of Plaintiff's death certificate was sent to Plaintiff's last known residence where he resided with his next of kin. In light of the foregoing, Defendants are directed to serve a copy of this Opinion and Order upon Plaintiff's next of kin, Lisa Stevens, at her last known address, and to file proof of service on the docket. Plaintiff's next of kin, Lisa Stevens, shall have until May 10, 2019 (ninety days from service a copy of the death certificate), to move to be substituted as the representative of Plaintiff for the purpose of prosecuting Plaintiff's remaining claim(s). In the event there is no timely substitution, the Complaint shall be deemed dismissed upon Defendants submitting an affidavit informing the Court that no substitution has been requested and upon submission of a proposed order of dismissal.

Dated: March 5, 2020 SO ORDERED: White Plains, New York . fo nited es District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Unicorn Tales, Inc. v. Banerjee
138 F.3d 467 (Second Circuit, 1998)
Kaplan v. Lehrer
173 F. App'x 934 (Second Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McNair v. Anthony J. Annucci, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnair-v-anthony-j-annucci-nysd-2020.