McNabb v. State
This text of 689 So. 2d 371 (McNabb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Having considered the various arguments presented by the appellant in this direct criminal appeal, we affirm his convictions. We reject his argument pursuant to Coney v. State, 653 So.2d 1009 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 315, 133 L.Ed.2d 218 (1995), because the record is insufficient to show that peremptory challenges were exercised. See Ganyard v. State, 686 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
689 So. 2d 371, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1359, 1997 WL 68048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnabb-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.