McNabb v. State
689 So. 2d 371, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1359, 1997 WL 68048
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 1997·No. No. 95-865·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Having considered the various arguments presented by the appellant in this direct criminal appeal, we affirm his convictions. We reject his argument pursuant to Coney v. State, 653 So.2d 1009 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 315, 133 L.Ed.2d 218 (1995), because the record is insufficient to show that peremptory challenges were exercised. See Ganyard v. State, 686 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McNabb v. State, 689 So. 2d 371, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1359, 1997 WL 68048 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
689 So. 2d 371 (McNabb v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carmichael v. State
693 So. 2d 1141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
White v. State
689 So. 2d 371 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)