McNabb v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McNabb v. State

552 So. 2d 313, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2681, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6424, 1989 WL 137724

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 17, 1989

DocketNo. 88-02228

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 552 So. 2d 313 (McNabb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McNabb v. State, 552 So. 2d 313, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2681, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6424, 1989 WL 137724 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, James 0. McNabb, raises two issues. His first issue is without merit as this court has previously held that probation can be imposed consecutively to community control. Skeens v. State, 542 So.2d 436 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

For his second issue, the defendant contends, and the state agrees, that the trial court erred by imposing court costs without adequate notice or an opportunity to object as required by Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989) and Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the court costs without prejudice to [314]*314the state seeking to have them reimposed after proper notice.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and HALL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, James 0. McNabb, raises two issues. His first issue is without merit as this court has previously held that probation can be imposed consecutively to community control. Skeens v. State, 542 So.2d 436 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

For his second issue, the defendant contends, and the state agrees, that the trial court erred by imposing court costs without adequate notice or an opportunity to object as required by Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989) and Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the court costs without prejudice to [314]*314the state seeking to have them reimposed after proper notice.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and HALL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

552 So. 2d 313, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2681, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6424, 1989 WL 137724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcnabb-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack