McNabb v. State

552 So. 2d 313, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2681, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6424, 1989 WL 137724
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 17, 1989·No. No. 88-02228·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, James 0. McNabb, raises two issues. His first issue is without merit as this court has previously held that probation can be imposed consecutively to community control. Skeens v. State, 542 So.2d 436 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

For his second issue, the defendant contends, and the state agrees, that the trial court erred by imposing court costs without adequate notice or an opportunity to object as required by Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989) and Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the court costs without prejudice to [314]*314the state seeking to have them reimposed after proper notice.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and HALL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McNabb v. State, 552 So. 2d 313, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2681, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6424, 1989 WL 137724 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

552 So. 2d 313 (McNabb v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
566 So. 2d 593 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)