McMurtry v. Schneider
This text of 182 A. 618 (McMurtry v. Schneider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole and entire question in this case is whether a suit for deficiency under section 48 (3 Comp. Stat., p. 3421), upon a bond, secured by a mortgage, must be instituted within six months from the date of the public sale or from the date of confirmation of the sale.
This question has been recently, definitely, settled by this court in Wooton v. Pollock, 119 N. J. Eq. 128, requiring a reversal of the judgment under review, with costs.
For affirmance — None.
For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 14.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 A. 618, 116 N.J.L. 86, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmurtry-v-schneider-nj-1936.