McMurtry v. Ramsey

25 Ark. 349
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJune 15, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 25 Ark. 349 (McMurtry v. Ramsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McMurtry v. Ramsey, 25 Ark. 349 (Ark. 1869).

Opinion

Bowen, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note executed by plaintiff in error, and J. B. Kestuson (not sued herein) to Thhmas M. McCollough, in his lifetime. Ramsey, administrator of McCullough, brought suit upon the note, in the circuit court of Bradley county. The defendant, McMurtry, plead, setting up that the note sued oh was given for a horse, to be used in the service of the Confederate States, and that McCollough knew the purpose for which he was purchased. Plaintiff demurred to this plea, and the court sustained the demurrer, and rendered judgment for the amount of the note, damages, costs, &c. The defense set up by McMurtry was a good one, and plaintiff’s demurrer should have been overruled. See the case of Kelly v. Tatum, decided at the last term of this court-

judgment reversed.

Judge Harrison, being disqualified, did not sit in this case. Hon. John Whytock, Special Supreme Judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ashford v. Mace
146 S.W. 474 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Ark. 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmurtry-v-ramsey-ark-1869.