McMurray v. Mial

Supreme Court of New Jersey

McMurray v. Mial

90 A. 317, 86 N.J.L. 358, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 267

DecidedMarch 16, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 90 A. 317 (McMurray v. Mial) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McMurray v. Mial, 90 A. 317, 86 N.J.L. 358, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 267 (N.J. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirme’d, for the reasons firstly and secondly expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chancellor in the ease of Davis v. Mial, at the present term of this court, ante p. 167.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trencharb, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Vrebenburgl-i, Congbon, White, Heppenheimer, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirme’d, for the reasons firstly and secondly expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chancellor in the ease of Davis v. Mial, at the present term of this court, ante p. 167.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trencharb, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Vrebenburgl-i, Congbon, White, Heppenheimer, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 A. 317, 86 N.J.L. 358, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmurray-v-mial-nj-1914.