McMurray v. McMurray

190 P. 924, 58 Mont. 229, 1920 Mont. LEXIS 101
CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 25, 1920
DocketNo. 4,166
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 190 P. 924 (McMurray v. McMurray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McMurray v. McMurray, 190 P. 924, 58 Mont. 229, 1920 Mont. LEXIS 101 (Mo. 1920).

Opinion

MR. JUSTICE MATTHEWS

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff having commenced annulment proceedings, the court, on application of the defendant, awarded her temporary alimony, suit money and attorney’s fees necessary to enable her to defend. The plaintiff appeals, challenging the jurisdiction of the court to make such an order in an annulment proceeding.

The question thus raised was disposed of contrary to the' [1] contention of plaintiff in the ease of State ex rel. Wooten v. District Court, 57 Mont. 517, 189 Pac. 233. However, as the power of the court exists only while the validity of the marriage continues in doubt, or, as was said 'in the Wooten Case, while “the annulment suit is pending, whether in the district court, or in this court on appeal,”' the allowance, under the order, will cease upon the final entry of a decree in favor of the husband.

The order of the district court of Chouteau county is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Brantly and Associate Justices Holloway, Hurly and Cooper concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. Davis
122 P.2d 497 (Washington Supreme Court, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 P. 924, 58 Mont. 229, 1920 Mont. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmurray-v-mcmurray-mont-1920.