Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/McMullin v. Doughty

McMullin v. Doughty

52 A. 1132, 63 N.J. Eq. 800, 18 Dickinson 800, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 195
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McMullin v. Doughty. Read the opinion of the Court — 68 N.J. Eq. 776 →
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 23, 1902·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Grey delivered in the court below. See 17 Dick. Ch. Rep. 252.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Van Syokel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Vroom—13. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMullin v. Doughty, 52 A. 1132, 63 N.J. Eq. 800, 18 Dickinson 800, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 195 (N.J. 1902).

52 A. 1132 (McMullin v. Doughty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.