McMullen v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McMullen v. State

1921 OK CR 214, 200 P. 292, 20 Okla. Crim. 128, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 116

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 10, 1921

DocketNo. A-3745.

StatusPublished

This text of 1921 OK CR 214 (McMullen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McMullen v. State, 1921 OK CR 214, 200 P. 292, 20 Okla. Crim. 128, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 116 (Okla. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

*129 PER CURIAM.

Upon an information jointly charging Frank McMullen and Jim Thompson with the theft of two automobile casings of the value of $51, the personal property of D. W. Pinkston, appellant, Frank McMullen, upon his separate trial was convicted and his punishment fixed at six months imprisonment in the penitentiary. From the judgment rendered on the verdict he appealed by filing in this court on April 5, 1920, a petition in error with case-made, but there has been no appearance in his behalf on his appeal in this court. When the case was called for final submission it was submitted on the record.

The record shows that the only evidence introduced was that offered by the state.

We think the evidence, without any doubt, is ample to sustain the conviction. After a careful examination of the record we conclude that there was no error which could have been prejudicial to the defendant. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*129 PER CURIAM.

Upon an information jointly charging Frank McMullen and Jim Thompson with the theft of two automobile casings of the value of $51, the personal property of D. W. Pinkston, appellant, Frank McMullen, upon his separate trial was convicted and his punishment fixed at six months imprisonment in the penitentiary. From the judgment rendered on the verdict he appealed by filing in this court on April 5, 1920, a petition in error with case-made, but there has been no appearance in his behalf on his appeal in this court. When the case was called for final submission it was submitted on the record.

The record shows that the only evidence introduced was that offered by the state.

We think the evidence, without any doubt, is ample to sustain the conviction. After a careful examination of the record we conclude that there was no error which could have been prejudicial to the defendant. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1921 OK CR 214, 200 P. 292, 20 Okla. Crim. 128, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmullen-v-state-oklacrimapp-1921.