McMullen v. State

200 Ga. 812
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 9, 1946
DocketNo. 15446
StatusPublished

This text of 200 Ga. 812 (McMullen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McMullen v. State, 200 Ga. 812 (Ga. 1946).

Opinion

Atkinson, Justice.

Where an extraordinary motion- for new trial based upon newly discovered evidence is filed, and the State makes a counter-showing which contradicts the evidence upon which the motion is based, it is not an abuse of discretion for the trial judge to overrule the motion. Morris v. State, 177 Ga. 365 (170 S. E. 217), and cit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Charles Redman and Frank A. Bowers, for plaintiff in error. Fugene Gook, Attorney-General, Frank B. Willingham, Solicitor-General, and G. F. Gregory Jr., Assistant Attorney-General, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morris v. State
170 S.E. 217 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 Ga. 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmullen-v-state-ga-1946.