McMullen v. State

682 So. 2d 229, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12327, 1996 WL 670288
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McMullen v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 631 So. 2d 1126
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 20, 1996·No. No. 96-1995·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse the defendant’s fifteen-year sentence and remand for resentencing pursuant to the sentencing guidelines and the plea [230]*230agreement. See Hunt v. State, 613 So.2d 893, 897 (Fla.1992)(“A ‘constant factor’ insuring basic fairness in the plea bargaining process is the requirement that “when a plea rests in any significant degree on a promise or agreement of the prosecutor, so that it can be said to be part of the inducement or consideration, such promise must be fulfilled.’ ”)(citing Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262, 92 S.Ct. 495, 499, 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971)).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMullen v. State, 682 So. 2d 229, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12327, 1996 WL 670288 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

682 So. 2d 229 (McMullen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Santobello v. New York
404 U.S. 257 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Hunt v. State
613 So. 2d 893 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)