McMullen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McMullen v. State

331 So. 2d 357, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14161

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 5, 1976

DocketNo. Z-402

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 331 So. 2d 357 (McMullen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McMullen v. State, 331 So. 2d 357, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14161 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinions

BY THE COURT.

The State adduced sufficient evidence to constitute a prima facie showing, pursuant to Rule 3.191(e), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, that the accused made himself unavailable for trial by failing to respond to a notice of arraignment regularly mailed to him. In the circumstances of this case, the trial court was not obliged to accept as conclusive the accused’s denial that he received the notice of arraignment. Contrast State ex rel. Kennedy v. McCauley, 265 So.2d 547 (Fla.App. 4th, 1972). The trial court was therefore justified in its conclusion that the accused need not be discharged under the speedy trial rule. The judgment and sentence are therefore

AFFIRMED.

MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur. BOYER, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT.

The State adduced sufficient evidence to constitute a prima facie showing, pursuant to Rule 3.191(e), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, that the accused made himself unavailable for trial by failing to respond to a notice of arraignment regularly mailed to him. In the circumstances of this case, the trial court was not obliged to accept as conclusive the accused’s denial that he received the notice of arraignment. Contrast State ex rel. Kennedy v. McCauley, 265 So.2d 547 (Fla.App. 4th, 1972). The trial court was therefore justified in its conclusion that the accused need not be discharged under the speedy trial rule. The judgment and sentence are therefore

AFFIRMED.

MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur. BOYER, C. J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

331 So. 2d 357, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmullen-v-state-fladistctapp-1976.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack