McMullen v. Kutz

934 A.2d 1162, 594 Pa. 57, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2282
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 25, 2007·No. Appeal 468 MAL 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*58 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of October 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner is:

Should this Court grant this petition for allowance of appeal when the decision by the Superior Court in this case is in conflict with the decisions of the Superior Court in both Creeks v. Creeks, 422 Pa.Super. 432, 619 A.2d 754 (1993) and Profit Wize Marketing v. Wiest, 2002 Pa.Super. 380, 812 A.2d 1270 (2002).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMullen v. Kutz, 934 A.2d 1162, 594 Pa. 57, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2282 (Pa. 2007).

934 A.2d 1162 (McMullen v. Kutz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McMullen v. Kutz
985 A.2d 769 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)