Home/Supreme Court of Florida/McMullen v. Klotz

McMullen v. Klotz

41 So. 2d 166, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 737
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McMullen v. Klotz. Read the opinion of the Court — 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1408 →
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 17, 1949·Published

Opinions

On rehearing.

Rehearing denied.

For former opinion, see 40 So.2d 769. Counsel for respondent having filed in this cause petition for rehearing and it having been considered, it is ordered that said motion be and the same is hereby denied.

ADAMS, C.J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

CHAPMAN, BARNS, and HOBSON, JJ., dissent. *Page 167

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMullen v. Klotz, 41 So. 2d 166, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 737 (Fla. 1949).

41 So. 2d 166 (McMullen v. Klotz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McMullen v. Klotz
40 So. 2d 769 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1949)
Walker v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.
92 So. 287 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1922)