McMullen v. Brazelton

81 Ala. 442
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1886·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

CLOPTON, J.-

— This is a proceeding in the Probate Court to make a final settlement of the administration of the estate of Margaret Brazelton, and distribution among her distributees. The record shows, that Susan Hannah, one of the distributees, had died after the death of the intestate, who was her mother. Her personal representative was not made a party to the proceeding, and her distributive share was divided between her husband and three children, for which decrees were rendered in their favor. From the organization of the Probate Court, it has been uniformly ruled, that a decree on the final settlement of an estate is erroneous, if any of the distributees die after the death of the intestate, and their personal representatives are not brought before the court. And advantage may be [443] taken of the omission in this court, though no objection was made thereto in the Probate Court, the representative of the deceased distributee being an indispensable party. McComico v. Cannon, 25 Ala. 462; Boyett v. Kerr, 7 Ala. 9; Hall v. Andrews, 17 Ala. 40 ; Thomas v. Dumas, 30 Ala. 83.

Beversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMullen v. Brazelton, 81 Ala. 442 (Ala. 1886).

81 Ala. 442 (McMullen v. Brazelton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re McLeod's Estate
82 P.2d 884 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1938)
Morris v. Virden
21 S.W. 223 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1893)