McMullen & Co. v. Croft

164 P. 930, 96 Wash. 275
Washington Supreme Court·Decided May 12, 1917·No. No. 13320·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinions

Holcomb, Parker, and Morris, JJ.

(dissenting) — We dissent and adhere to views expressed in 92 Wash. 411, 159 Pac. 875. The lien notices were fled within the ninety-day period provided by law for fling notices of liens, but were not registered with the registrar of titles, who was also county auditor, and noted on the certificate. The law requiring the provisions relating to such liens to be liberally construed so as to effectuate their objects was certainly not repealed by the “Torrens law.” This decision assuredly does so, and will result in great injustice, not only in this case, but in others, to laborers and materialmen.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMullen & Co. v. Croft, 164 P. 930, 96 Wash. 275 (Wash. 1917).

164 P. 930 (McMullen & Co. v. Croft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Intermountain Elec., Inc. v. GAT BROS. CONST., INC.
62 P.3d 548 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2003)
Intermountain Electric, Inc. v. G-A-T Bros. Construction, Inc.
115 Wash. App. 384 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2003)
Lumberman's of Washington, Inc. v. Barnhardt
949 P.2d 382 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1997)
Schulenburg v. Storre
272 P. 514 (Washington Supreme Court, 1928)
Rose v. O'Reilly
244 P. 124 (Washington Supreme Court, 1926)
Chicago & Riverdale Lumber Co. v. Vellenga
224 Ill. App. 505 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1922)
Hacken v. Isenberg
124 N.E. 306 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1919)
Bjornberg v. Myers
212 Ill. App. 257 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1918)
Hacken v. Isenberg
210 Ill. App. 120 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1918)