McMullan v. State
This text of 176 So. 598 (McMullan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The brief for appellants must have been prepared without an examination of the record, for the only error argued is the alleged error of the court in sustaining an objection to a question propounded to the chief prosecuting witness in regard to Mrs. Davis’ physical condition, when the record shows that, immediately upon the sustaining of the objection, the witness nevertheless answered and stated as follows: ‘ ‘ That is a question I could not answer anyhow.”
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 So. 598, 179 Miss. 749, 1937 Miss. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcmullan-v-state-miss-1937.