Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McMullan v. McMullan

McMullan v. McMullan

760 So. 2d 1099, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8173, 2000 WL 864470
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McMullan v. McMullan. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 6015 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 30, 2000·No. No. 5D99-3624·Published

Opinion

HARRIS, J.

The former husband appeals the trial court’s order of contempt giving him 10 days to comply with a previous order to turn over a 1999 Jeep automobile or its [1100]*1100fair market value of $30,000 to the former wife or spend 179 days in the St. Johns County Jail. The judge found that the former husband had been deceitful and had committed a fraud upon the court by attempting to protect the Jeep from seizure by preparing and delivering false documents. The evidence of such deceit is overwhelming and the court’s action most restrained. We affirm the contempt order.

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMullan v. McMullan, 760 So. 2d 1099, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8173, 2000 WL 864470 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

760 So. 2d 1099 (McMullan v. McMullan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.